Steady RANS Assessment of Stall Fence Effects on Wells Turbine Performance for Oscillating Water Column Systems



Metrics Analysis (Dimensions & PlumX)

Indexing:
Similarity:

© 2026 Muhammad Nurfajriansyah Muslich, Aditya Rio Prabowo, Ristiyanto Adiputra, Seung Jun Baek, Svitlana Onyshchenko, Mahfud Alfajar, Dominicus Danardono Dwi Prija Tjahjana, Iwan Istanto, Rahman Wijaya, Hermes Carvalho

The Wells turbine is a key component in an Oscillating Water Column (OWC)-based ocean wave energy conversion system, yet its limited operating range due to leading-edge stall constrains overall system efficiency. This study presents an independent CFD benchmark of the performance of the Wells turbine with and without a passive flow control device, a stall fence, as investigated by Das and Samad (2020). Steady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations using the SST k-ω turbulence model were performed in ANSYS CFX v22.1 by replicating the original geometry, boundary conditions, and mesh density for direct comparison. The reference turbine (eight NACA 0015 blades, solidity 0.64) and the configuration with a stall fence (fences at 40% and 80% span) were evaluated over a flow coefficient range of φ = 0.075-0.275. Grid independence study using quantitative (non-dimensional torque T*) and qualitative (tip-vortex topology) criteria resulted in the selection of a 3.5-million-element mesh. For the reference turbine, a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 2.0% for T* and 3.1% for efficiency was obtained in the pre-stall range (φ ≤ 0.225), confirming strong numerical reproducibility. However, steady RANS failed to predict the stall onset for the reference configurations and overpredicted torque by up to 508% in the post-stall region. The stall point at φ = 0.250 was successfully reproduced with a deviation approaching zero, proving that the vorticity induced by the fence geometry enhances the reliability of RANS stall predictions. The pre-stall MAPE for the fence configuration was 4.4% for T*, slightly higher due to local vortex interactions around the fence. These findings establish steady RANS as a reliable design tool in the pre-stall range and demonstrate that passive fence stalls not only extend the turbine’s operating range but also improve the accuracy of CFD predictions.

 

Keywords: Wells turbine, Stall fence, CFD benchmark, Steady RANS, Ocean wave energy conversion.

ANSYS, Inc. (2009). ANSYS CFX-solver theory guide (Release 12.1). ANSYS, Inc.

Curran, R., & Gato, L. M. C. (1997). The energy conversion performance of several types of Wells turbine designs. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 211(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1243/0957650971537051

Das, T. K., & Samad, A. (2020). Influence of stall fences on the performance of Wells turbine. Energy, 194, Article 116864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116864

Falcão, A. F. O., & Henriques, J. C. C. (2016). Oscillating-water-column wave energy converters and air turbines: A review. Renewable Energy, 85, 1391–1424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.086

Gareev, A. (2011). Analysis of variable pitch air turbines for oscillating water column (OWC) wave energy converters [Doctoral dissertation, University of Wollongong]. University of Wollongong Research Online. https://ro.uow.edu.au/articles/thesis/Analysis_of_variable_pitch_air_turbines_for_oscillating_water_column_OWC_wave_energy_converters/27664317

Ghisu, T., Puddu, P., & Cambuli, F. (2016). Physical explanation of the hysteresis in Wells turbines: A critical reconsideration. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 138(11), Article 111105. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4033320

Ghisu, T., Cambuli, F., Puddu, P., Mandas, N., Seshadri, P., & Parks, G. T. (2018). Numerical evaluation of entropy generation in isolated airfoils and Wells turbines. Meccanica, 53(14), 3437–3456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-018-0896-1

Halder, P., Mohamed, M. H., & Samad, A. (2018). Wave energy conversion: Design and shape optimization. Ocean Engineering, 150, 337–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.12.072

Halder, P., Samad, A., Kim, J.-H., & Choi, Y.-S. (2015). High performance ocean energy harvesting turbine design–A new casing treatment scheme. Energy, 86, 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.131

Kumar, P. M., Halder, P., Husain, A., & Samad, A. (2019). Performance enhancement of Wells turbine: Combined radiused edge blade tip, static extended trailing edge, and variable thickness modifications. Ocean Engineering, 185, 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.05.041

Menter, F. R. (1993). Zonal two-equation k-ω turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. In AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference (AIAA Paper 93-2906). American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1993-2906

Okuhara, S., Takao, M., Takami, A., & Setoguchi, T. (2013). Wells turbine for wave energy conversion—Improvement of the performance by means of impulse turbine for bi-directional flow. Open Journal of Fluid Dynamics, 3(2A), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojfd.2013.32A006

Setoguchi, T., Takao, M., & Kaneko, K. (1998). Hysteresis on Wells turbine characteristics in reciprocating flow. International Journal of Rotating Machinery, 4(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1155/S1023621X98000025

Solfelt, D. A., & Maple, R. C. (2008). CFD analysis of a T-38 wing fence. In 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit (AIAA Paper 2008-331). American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2008-331

Takao, M., Takasaki, K., Okuhara, S., & Setoguchi, T. (2014). Wells turbine for wave energy conversion—Improvement of stall characteristics by the use of 3-dimensional blades. Journal of Fluid Science and Technology, 9(3), Article JFST0052. https://doi.org/10.1299/jfst.2014jfst0052

Uddin, M. N., Opoku, F., & Atkinson, M. (2024). Investigation of a modified Wells turbine for wave energy extraction. Energies, 17(15), Article 3638. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17153638

Wauters, J., Couckuyt, I., Knudde, N., Dhaene, T., & Degroote, J. (2020). Multi-objective optimization of a wing fence on an unmanned aerial vehicle using surrogate-derived gradients. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 61(1), 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02364-x

Supplementary file to text

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The copyright is reserved to Research in Education, Technology, and Multiculture that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Address:

CV. IMRECS: Jalan Gagak I, Kecamatan Larangan, Kota Tangerang. Postal Code: 15155

STKIP Al Islam Tunas Bangsa: Jalan Z.A. Pagar Alam No. 41 Gedong Meneng Bandar Lampung