A Critical Analysis of Sociology Teachers' Pedagogical Practices Through Performance Test Documents of the 2025 In-Service Teacher Professional Education Program



Metrics Analysis (Dimensions & PlumX)

Indexing:
Similarity:

© 2026 Siany Indria Liestyasari, Atik Catur Budiati, Dwi Astutik, Bagas Narendra Parahita, Ghufronudin Ghufronudin

This study aims to (1) describe the completeness and alignment of lesson planning in the teaching modules of Sociology teachers who took the 2025 In-Service Teacher UKIN with the indications of learning practice they contain, viewed through the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework, and (2) critically analyze teacher performance in the UKIN through the critical pedagogy perspectives of Paulo Freire and Henry Giroux and Stephen Ball's theory of performativity. The study used a qualitative approach, applying Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis to a purposive sample of 190 Sociology teaching-module documents from UKIN participants at one teacher-education institution (LPTK). The results show that the administrative-format completeness of the teaching modules is generally good, while the substantive depth of teachers' pedagogical competence remains variable. Lesson planning tends to target low-to-moderate cognitive levels, with lower-order thinking categories dominating most modules; assessment items misalign with Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)-oriented learning objectives in most documents; and PowerPoint remains the dominant, often the only, technology used across most modules. Viewed through the critical lenses of Freire's banking education, Giroux's transformative intellectuals, and Ball's performativity theory, these findings suggest that the UKIN's current design and practice emphasize administrative and technical compliance more than cultivating substantive pedagogical reflection among teachers. Nevertheless, these patterns also reveal concrete entry points for reform, including rubric refinement, continuous mentoring, and reflective assessment components, through which the UKIN could more fully realize its intended role in fostering transformative, reflective teaching practice.

Keywords: Teacher performance test; TPACK, Critical pedagogy, Sociology teaching module, Performativity

Abbitt, J. (2011). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge in preservice teacher education: A review of current methods and instruments. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782573

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT–TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006

Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view (2nd ed.). Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109348479

Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554

Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093022000043065

Bartlett, L. (2005). Dialogue, knowledge, and teacher-student relations: Freirean pedagogy in theory and practice. Comparative Education Review, 49(3), 344–364. https://doi.org/10.1086/430261

Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 624–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325

Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Blomberg, G., Sherin, M. G., Renkl, A., Glogger, I., & Seidel, T. (2013). Understanding video as a tool for teacher education: Investigating instructional strategies to promote reflection. Instructional Science, 41(3), 443–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9231-4

Bostean, G., & Leitz, L. (2022). Using sociological images to develop the sociological imagination. Teaching Sociology, 50(2), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X211054572

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

Campbell, J. L., Quincy, C., Osserman, J., & Pedersen, O. K. (2013). Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: Problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(3), 294–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113500475

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000

Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5–6), 523–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00015-9

de la Vega Rodríguez, L. F., & Carrasco-Aguilar, C. L. (2026). Performative accountability: A close examination of a dominant model. In L. F. de la Vega Rodríguez & C. L. Carrasco Aguilar (Eds.), Contesting educational accountability research (pp. 1–14). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-16112-3_1

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x

Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001

Fobes, C., & Kaufman, P. (2008). Critical pedagogy in the sociology classroom: Challenges and concerns. Teaching Sociology, 36(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X0803600104

Freire, P. (2007). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.; M. B. Ramos, Trans.). Continuum. (Original work published 1970)

Frostenson, M., & Englund, H. (2020). Teachers, performative techniques and professional values: How performativity becomes humanistic through interplay mechanisms. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(6), 695–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2020.1761943

Giroux, H. A. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning. Bergin & Garvey.

Giroux, H. A. (2010). Rethinking education as the practice of freedom: Paulo Freire and the promise of critical pedagogy. Policy Futures in Education, 8(6), 715–721. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2010.8.6.715

Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57(3), 1953–1960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.010

Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2012). The distribution of teacher quality and implications for policy. Annual Review of Economics, 4, 131–157. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080511-111001

Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2009). Teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782536

Harris, J. B., & Hofer, M. J. (2011). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: A descriptive study of secondary teachers' curriculum-based, technology-related instructional planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782570

Haryanto, E., Mukminin, A., Murboyono, R., Muazza, M., & Ekatina, M. (2016). Teacher certification policy in Indonesia: Evidence from certified English teachers at one public high school. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 7(3), 224–244. https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.31703

Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Williams, E. N. (1997). A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. The Counseling Psychologist, 25(4), 517–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000097254001

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3

Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368

Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. (2025). Panduan pembelajaran dan asesmen (Edisi revisi) [Guidelines for learning and assessment]. https://kurikulum.kemendikdasmen.go.id/file/1755668120_manage_file.pdf#page=16.35

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.2190/0EW7-01WB-BKHL-QDYV

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70. https://citejournal.org/volume-9/issue-1-09/general/what-is-technological-pedagogicalcontent-knowledge

Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Examining the technological pedagogical content knowledge of Singapore pre-service teachers with a large-scale survey. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(6), 557–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00372.x

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781

Liu, T., & Wong, J. L. N. (2026). Performer versus caring professional: Identity conflicts of preschool teachers in the context of performative culture in mainland China. Educational Review, 78(3), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2025.2486755

Luo, J., & Chan, C. K. Y. (2024). Assessing students' holistic development in China: Managerialism, market, and performativity as policy technologies. Asia Pacific Education Review, 25(4), 885–895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09842-4

Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I—Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Moore, H. L. (2015). Global prosperity and sustainable development goals. Journal of International Development, 27(6), 801–815. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3114

Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 129–152. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129

Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), Article 1609406917733847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

OECD. (2025). Unlocking high-quality teaching. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f5b82176-en

Palmer, N. (2023). The sociological imagination within Teaching Sociology: 1973–2020. Teaching Sociology, 51(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X221098452

Pecheone, R. L., & Chung, R. R. (2006). Evidence in teacher education: The Performance Assessment for California Teachers (PACT). Journal of Teacher Education, 57(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487105284045

Rosenberg, J. M., & Koehler, M. J. (2015). Context and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A systematic review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(3), 186–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2015.1052663

Sato, M. (2014). What is the underlying conception of teaching of the edTPA? Journal of Teacher Education, 65(5), 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114542518

Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Shin, T. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544

Seifert, H., & Lindmeier, A. (2024). Developing a performance-based assessment to measure pre-service secondary teachers' digital competence to use digital mathematics tools. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 45(2), Article 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-024-00251-7

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Stafford-Smith, M., Griggs, D., Gaffney, O., Ullah, F., Reyers, B., Kanie, N., Stigson, B., Shrivastava, P., Leach, M., & O'Connell, D. (2017). Integration: The key to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability Science, 12(6), 911–919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0383-3

Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers' pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2

UNESCO. (2024). Global report on teachers: Addressing teacher shortages and transforming the profession. United Nations. https://doi.org/10.18356/9789231006555

United Nations General Assembly. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1). United Nations. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3923923

Unterhalter, E. (2019). The many meanings of quality education: Politics of targets and indicators in SDG4. Global Policy, 10(S1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12591

van Wyk, M., & le Grange, L. (2017). Performatiwiteit as verskynsel in die onderwys [Performativity as phenomenon in education]. LitNet Akademies, 14(2), 540–564. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/104152

Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge – a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x

Yang, J., & Wei, H. (2025). Development of a scale of teachers' perceived training quality from the perspective of TPACK. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, Article 34. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04271-z

Yue, M., Jong, M. S.-Y., & Ng, D. T. K. (2024). Understanding K–12 teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge readiness and attitudes toward artificial intelligence education. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 19505–19536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12621-2

Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher order thinking skills and low-achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 145–181. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_1

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The copyright is reserved to Pedagogy Review that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Address:

CV. IMRECS: Jalan Gagak I, Kecamatan Larangan, Kota Tangerang. Postal Code: 15155