Evaluation of Guest Lecturer Implementation, Challenges and Perceived Impact in Higher Education
This study evaluated the implementation of the Guest Lecturer (GL) program in higher education, particularly students’ perceptions of its educational value, instructional delivery, learning motivation, and implementation challenges in Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL). The study employed an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design with 35 university students and three visiting lecturers. Quantitative data were collected through a 19-item questionnaire, using a four-point Likert scale. Qualitative data were collected from three open-ended questions and structured written reflections by the guest lecturers. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Spearman’s rank order correlation, and thematic analysis. The results showed that students viewed the program positively overall, especially regarding the relevance of the learning materials (M = 3.49) and exposure to international perspectives (M = 3.23). However, students also reported challenges with internet access, using digital platforms, presentation skills, and limited interaction. Spearman’s correlation analysis revealed a significant negative association between difficulties switching between digital platforms and course-related learning motivation (ρ = -0.554, Bonferroni-adjusted p = 0.009). This finding highlights the link between digital education barriers and student motivation. The qualitative results also indicated benefits related to cultural exchange, language skills, and career progression, but also pinpointed technical issues, speech rate, and low engagement as key barriers to implementation. The study suggests that the GL program offers a great opportunity for worldwide academic involvement and meaningful educational experiences. However, to use it effectively, the program needs more technological support, better cooperation between visiting and local teachers, and more interactive learning activities to improve student participation and learning outcomes.
Keywords: Guest Lecturer program, Learning motivation; Students’ perceptions; International Collaboration; English Language Teaching
Akbari, M., Nguyen, H. M., McClelland, R., & Van Houdt, K. (2022). Design, implementation and academic perspectives on authentic assessment for applied business higher education in a top performing Asian economy. Education + Training, 64(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-04-2021-0121
Ali, N., Afwadzi, B., Abdullah, I., & Mukmin, M. I. (2021). Interreligious Literacy Learning as a Counter-Radicalization Method: A New Trend among Institutions of Islamic Higher Education in Indonesia. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 32(4), 383–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2021.1996978
Angelaki, M. E., Bersimis, F., Karvounidis, T., & Douligeris, C. (2024). Towards more sustainable higher education institutions: Implementing the sustainable development goals and embedding sustainability into the information and computer technology curricula. Education and Information Technologies, 29(4), 5079–5113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12025-8
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Carvalho, T., Diogo, S., & Vilhena, B. (2022). Invisible researchers in the knowledge society – the Uberisation of scientific work in Portugal. European Journal of Higher Education, 12(4), 393–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2022.2105371
Catalano, T., & Barriga, A. M. (2021). Shaping the teaching and learning of intercultural communication through virtual mobility. Intercultural Communication Education, 4(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.29140/ice.v4n1.443
Choi, J., Tatar, B., & Kim, J. (2021). Bilingual signs at an ‘English only’ Korean university: place-making and ‘global’ space in higher education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 24(9), 1431–1444. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1610353
Cownie, F., & Gallo, M. (2021). Alumni gratitude and academics: implications for engagement. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(6), 788–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1820457
Creswell, J. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Fourth Ed.). Sage Publications.
Fleischmann, K. (2021). Hands-on versus virtual: Reshaping the design classroom with blended learning. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 20(1), 87–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022220906393
Garlinska, M., Osial, M., Proniewska, K., & Pregowska, A. (2023). The Influence of Emerging Technologies on Distance Education. Electronics, 12(7), 1550. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12071550
Hauser, C., & Ryan, A. (2021). Higher education institutions, PRME and partnerships for the goals: retrofit labeling or driving force for change? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 12(6), 1268–1288. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2020-0069
Hilton, J., Syed, N., Weiss, M. J., Tereshko, L., Marya, V., Marshall, K., Gatzunis, K., Russell, C., & Driscoll, N. (2021). Initiatives to Address Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Within a Higher Education ABA Department. Behavior and Social Issues, 30(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-021-00082-y
Hoffman, J., Pelzer, P., Albert, L., Béneker, T., Hajer, M., & Mangnus, A. (2021). A futuring approach to teaching wicked problems. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 45(4), 576–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2020.1869923
Jablon-Roberts, S., & McCracken, A. (2023). Virtual Guest Speakers in Textile and Apparel Courses: Student Experiences and Expectations. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 41(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X221075765
Klegeris, A. (2021). Mixed-mode instruction using active learning in small teams improves generic problem-solving skills of university students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(7), 871–885. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1826036
Leathwood, C., & Read, B. (2022). Short-term, short-changed? A temporal perspective on the implications of academic casualisation for teaching in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 27(6), 756–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1742681
Mendoza, C., Dervin, F., Yuan (袁梅), M., & Layne, H. (2022). “They Are Not Mixing With Others”: Finnish Lecturers’ Perspectives on International Students’ (Mis-)Encounters in Higher Education. ECNU Review of Education, 5(1), 89–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531120976653
Peimani, N., & Kamalipour, H. (2022). The Future of Design Studio Education: Student Experience and Perception of Blended Learning and Teaching during the Global Pandemic. Education Sciences, 12(2), 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020140
Pepple, D. G., Akaighe, G. O., Sambo, A., George-Aremu, O., Bosah, G., & Trollman, H. (2025). Using guest lectures to enhance student employability: pedagogical considerations. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2452076
Persson, C., Einarson, D., & Melén, M. (2023). Educating the educators to be a driving force in higher education towards sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24(9), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-10-2022-0332
Phan, T. A., Vu, T. H. D., Vo, N., & Le, T.-H. (2026). Enhancing Educational Outcomes Through Strategic Guest Speaker Selection: A Comparative Study of Alumni and Industry Experts in University Settings. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 89, 656 - 674. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906241263035
Qamariah, H., & Hercz, M. (2025). The Impact of Professional Development Programs on English as a Foreign Language Instructors in Higher Education Institutions. Education Sciences, 15(8), 1071. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15081071
Skulmowski, A., Xu, K.M. (2022). Understanding Cognitive Load in Digital and Online Learning: A New Perspective on Extraneous Cognitive Load. Educ Psychol Rev 34, 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09624-7
Spiegel, T., & Nivette, A. (2023). The relative impact of in-class closed-book versus take-home open-book examination type on academic performance, student knowledge retention, and well-being. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.2016607
Van Mol, C., & Perez-Encinas, A. (2022). Inclusive internationalisation: do different (social) groups of students need different internationalisation activities? Studies in Higher Education, 47(12), 2523–2538. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2022.2083102
Varghese, N. V., & Panigrahi, J. (2023). Innovations in Financing of Higher Education: An Overview. In Financing of Higher Education (pp. 1–13). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7391-8_1
Vereijken, M. W. C., & van der Rijst, R. M. (2023). Subject matter pedagogy in university teaching: how lecturers use relations between theory and practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(4), 880–893. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1863352
Yeh, C.-Y., & Tsai, C.-C. (2022). Massive Distance Education: Barriers and Challenges in Shifting to a Complete Online Learning Environment. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.928717
Zabeli, N., Kaçaniku, F., & Koliqi, D. (2021). Towards the inclusion of students with special needs in higher education: Challenges and prospects in Kosovo. Cogent Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1859438
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright is reserved to Pedagogy Review that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Address:
CV. IMRECS: Jalan Gagak I, Kecamatan Larangan, Kota Tangerang. Postal Code: 15155