Development and Validation of e-Modules Integrated with PBL and Local Wisdom to Enhance Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Skills

Syarful Annam, Agus Ramdani, Muh. Makhrus, Yusuf Sarkingobir

Abstract


Abstract: This study develops and validates e-modules incorporating Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and local wisdom to enhance students' critical thinking and problem-solving skills. As 21st-century education emphasizes the integration of technology and innovative strategies, these e-modules aim to support higher-order thinking while preserving cultural values amidst globalization. The research specifically focuses on the topic of Temperature and Heat for Grade VII junior high school science education. Using a Research and Development (R&D) approach based on the 4D model Define, Design, Develop, and Disseminate this study completes the development stage, including validation and preliminary testing. In the Define stage, a needs analysis identified that traditional teacher-centered methods inadequately develop students' critical thinking skills. The Design stage systematically structured the e-modules with reflective activities, interactive problem-solving exercises, and integration of local wisdom, leveraging Flip PDF Professional for engaging content creation. The e-modules underwent validation by three expert validators, who evaluated content, presentation, and language. Results showed a validity score exceeding 80% across all criteria, classified as "very valid." A preliminary test involving 30 Grade VII students employed a pre-test and post-test design. The analysis revealed a significant improvement in student performance, with the mean pre-test score of 60.25 increasing to a post-test mean of 85.75 (42.4% improvement). Statistical analysis using a paired ttest yielded a p-value of 0.001 (p < 0.05), confirming the e-modules' effectiveness. Additionally, the incorporation of local wisdom within the PBL framework was positively received, promoting cultural appreciation alongside cognitive skill development. In conclusion, the developed Flip PDF-based e-modules satisfy highquality educational standards and effectively enhance students' critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Their integration of technology and local cultural values positions them as impactful tools for junior high school science education.  

 

Keywords: e-module, problem-based learning, local wisdom, critical thinking, problem-solving.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alshammari, S. H., Ally, M., & Essa, A. A. (2019). Multimedia-based e-learning: A review paper. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, 4(1), 142–147.

Barrows, H. S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical Education, 20(6), 481–486.

Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining 21st-century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st-century skills (pp. 17–66). Springer.

Bishop, M. J., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. ASEE National Conference Proceedings.

Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A “quick and dirty” usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & I. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). Taylor & Francis.

Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.

Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30–35.

Chen, C. M., & Xiao, Y. T. (2021). Impact of flipped learning on students' cognitive and affective outcomes in e-learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(3), 378–393.

Cole, M., & Scribner, S. (1974). Culture and thought: A psychological introduction. John Wiley & Sons.

Ennis, R. H. (1985). A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills. Educational Leadership, 43(2), 44–48.

Eryilmaz, M. (2011). The effectiveness of blended learning environments. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 4(1), 23–35.

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4.

Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. The Delphi Report. The California Academic Press.

Febrianti, R. (2021). The effectiveness of digital learning media in improving students' comprehension and retention. Journal of Educational Research, 3(2), 123–135.

García, S., Hernández, M. A., & Caraballo, M. A. (2017). Cultural sustainability in education: The role of local wisdom. Sustainability, 9(5), 794.

Ghirardini, B. (2011). E-learning methodologies: A guide for designing and developing e-learning courses. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.

Kim, B., & Zhang, Q. (2019). Integrating local culture into the curriculum: A global perspective. Journal of Educational Change, 20(3), 321–339.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2020). TIMSS 2019 international results in mathematics and science. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results: What students know and can do. OECD Publishing.

Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463–466.

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544.

Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press.

Sangrà, A., Vlachopoulos, D., & Cabrera, N. (2012). Building an inclusive definition of e-learning: An approach to the conceptual framework. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(2), 145–159.

Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9–20.

Schmidt, H. G., Rotgans, J. I., & Yew, E. H. J. (2011). The process of problem- based learning: What works and why. Medical Education, 45(8), 792–806.

Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2017). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta- analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252–275.

Teo, T., & Wong, S. L. (2013). Modelling key drivers of e-learning satisfaction among students. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 165–175.

Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook. Indiana University.

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st-century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.61436/pedagogy/v3i2.pp104-115

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Pedagogy Review

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The copyright is reserved to Pedagogy Review that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Address:

STKIP Al Islam Tunas Bangsa: Jalan Z.A. Pagar Alam No. 41 Gedong Meneng Bandar Lampung

Institute of Multidisciplinary Research and Community Service: Jalan Airan Raya, Way Huwi, Lampung Selatan